Saturday, March 28, 2026

Beauty of Palms by William W. Froggatt

On September 28, 1935 the Sydney Morning Herald, published an article by Walter Froggatt entitled - Beauty of Palms. The Fan or Cabbage Palm. The interesting article is transcribed below and you can read it on Trove, here

The author Walter Wilson Froggatt (1858-1937), an entomologist was born in Melbourne. In 1880, he moved to the Mount Brown goldfield near Milparinka, New South Wales, where he collected specimens and then to the Flinders River, Queensland, where he sent specimens back to Sir Ferdinand von Mueller (1), the director of the Botanic Gardens in Melbourne. Froggatt was appointed special zoological collector and assistant zoologist, and later taxidermist, to the New Guinea expedition organized by the New South Wales branch of the (Royal) Geographical Society of Australasia. Later he worked in Queensland and in the Kimberleys in Western Australia. In 1891, he was a foundation member of Naturalists' Society of New South Wales, and served as President for eleven years; he was a council-member from 1910 of the (Royal) Zoological Society of New South Wales, which elected him a fellow in 1931, and a founder of the Australian Wattle League, the Gould League of Bird Lovers of New South Wales and the Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia and a member of the Australian National Research Council in 1921 until 1932. Walter was a prolific writer and in 1907 wrote Australian Insects the first general textbook on Australian entomology. He was also an outspoken critic of the introduction of cane toads into Australia, and the Froggatt Award, awarded by the Invasive Species Council, is named in his honour. He died in 1937 in Croydon, in New South Wales. (2)

Beauty of Palms. The Fan or Cabbage Palm. By Walter W. Froggatt. 

Nearly every group of palms has a decorative beauty of its own. It is somewhat remarkable that our landscape gardeners have not used more varieties in the beautification of our parks. The only palm to come into prominence in the suburbs of Sydney during the last twenty years is the Wild Date palm, Phoenix canariensis, a native of the Canary Islands. It has a bizarre beauty of its own; but, in the writer's opinion, it is a very unsuitable species for the adornment of our streets, or to have planted in avenues across our parks.

The most decorative palms are those with slender, graceful stems, and these should be planted in groups of five or seven, upon a hillside, or in a park well away from other trees. Among the most decorative are those popularly known as fan palms, on account of their fanlike foliage. One genus, Livistona, was created by Robert Brown (3) for an Australian species.

When forming a genus, many botanists commemorate the names of their friends, or of distinguished scientists. Brown named this genus after his friend, Patrick Murray, Baron de Livistine (4), a well-known horticulturist, who in his garden near Edinburgh had gathered together with 1000 trees and plants, and had enriched the Edinburgh Botanic Gardens with many rare specimens.

The members of this genus Livistona are found in northern Assam, southern China, the Malay Archipelago, New Guinea, and Australia. They are a distinctive group, palms with very tall, slender stems, and crowned with fan-shaped fronds; and each frond has a long stalk beset with powerful recurved spines. The handsome flower spathes spring out from among the base of the leaf stalks; each dainty flower has a three-cut calyx and a three-petalled corella. The round, dry fruit contains a single seed, and it is said to retain its vitality for a much longer period than those of other palms.

In Assam and China, the fronds of the Toko pot-palm. Livistona jenkinsiana, are used in the manufacture of the large umbrella shaped hats worn by the Chinese coolies working in the fields. They are also used for thatching the native houses. The round-leaf palm, Livistona rotundifolia, is a native of the Celebes Islands. Wallace (5), in that wonderful book, "The Malay Archipelago," says: "This palm tree is the most beautiful fanleaf I have ever seen, with a slender stem not more than ten inches in diameter raising its crown of fronds a hundred feet up in the edge of the tropical forest." 

Lane-Poole (6) describes a handsome Livistona found in New Guinea, with a slender stem fifty feet in height and six inches in diameter, and a graceful crown of fan-shaped leaves on stalks nearly eight feet in length.

Livistona Australis
This fine fan-palm was better known to the colonists of New South Wales as the cabbage palm, because where vegetables were scarce they cut the palms down and made use of the unexpanded leaves in the centre of the crown by boiling it as a substitute for cabbage. Then, some enterprising settler conceived the idea of using the young foliage instead of straw for making hats. He may have seen the soft-plaited Panama hats of South America. The leaves were first boiled and then allowed to dry; then the pliable leaflets were split up and plaited into the low-crowned stiff "cabbage-tree" hats.


Cabbage tree hat with silk puggaree, c. 1860.
  This hat was worn by Marcus Clarke, journalist and novelist, after his arrival in Melbourne in 1863.
State Library of Victoria image https://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/209287

This palm has a wonderful range, and it was aptly named "australis," for it grows as far south as Orbost, eastern Gippsland, Victoria, and ranges along the eastern coast of New South Wales and Queensland. The fan-palm round the Gulf of Carpentaria is now considered to be the same species.

Allan Cunningham (7) took seeds to England, a specimen was growing in the Royal Gardens at Kew in 1824, and its flowers were figured in the Botanical Magazine. It is said to have grown so tall that it was too big for the palm-house, and had to be removed. Specimens 100 feet in height are common; and there are records of this fan-palm attaining a height of 120 feet, with the stem not much over a foot in diameter

Livistona Mariae
This unique palm was discovered by Ernest Giles (8) and his exploring party when, in 1872, they were following up the source of the Finke River through the Krichauft Ranges. They entered a rugged gorge, which led into a beautiful valley dotted over with cypress pines and slender tall palms. It was a remarkable find-a desert-loving plant in the heart of Australia; and Ernest Giles named the valley "The Valley of Palms." This palm has a very limited range - down the valley, and thence spreading into some of the surrounding gullies through the range. It would be easy to count all the existing specimens of the Desert Palm. The valley was visited by the members of the Horn Exploring Expedition (9) in Central Australia in 1894, and the Valley of the Palms is described in the Botany of the Horn Expedition by Professor Tate (10), as follows: "The principal colony of this stately palm, which attains a height of 90 feet, is in Palm Creek, which joins the Finke River at about nine miles south of Hermannsburg. The trees, rooting in the joints of the bare sandstone floor of the creek bed, extend for a length of about two miles from its junction with the Glen of Palms; altogether there cannot be more than about 100 full-grown individuals."

Giles sent all his specimens to Baron von Mueller for identification and description; the Baron pronounced this a new palm. Giles, in this expedition, had named a mountain range "Alfred Range," in honour of Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh (11); and this suggested the name of the Princess Maria of Russia (12) to the baron, so he named this palm Livistona mariae in her honour.

Some time ago a friend received a package of seeds of this palm from the mission station at Hermannsburg, and he gave me a dozen of them to see whether I could germinate them, but up to date they have given no sign of germination. This palm has been grown in the Botanic Gardens at Rockhampton, Queensland.


A copse of central Australian cabbage palms (Livistona mariae), 
Palm Valley, Northern Territory, ca. 1946.
Image: National Library of Australia PIC/14192/177 LOC Album 1151

Livistona Alfredi
This fine palm was discovered some years later, in the valley of the Fortescue River and its tributaries, from the source of the Robe River and Caves Creek, North-west Australia. At first it was considered that it was the same species as Livistona mariae, but Mueller, when he had examined the specimen, pointed out that seeds, leaves, and flowers differed from that species. After listing it in his official report on the plants of North-west Australia, printed by the Western Australian Government, he described and named this palm in the pages of the Victorian Naturalist, 1892.

In giving it the specific name of "alfredi," to honour of the Duke of Edinburgh, he says: "At whose nuptial festivities the fan palm became dedicated to the Princess Maria of Russia." So, we have now two Australian fan palms, separated from each other by 800 miles of sunbaked land, uniting in name the Royal lovers. 

Footnotes
(1) Sir Ferdinand Jakob Heinrich von Mueller (1825–1896) - Australian Dictionary of Biography entry - https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/mueller-sir-ferdinand-jakob-heinrich-von-4266
(2) Walter Wilson Froggatt (1858-1937) - Australian Dictionary of Biography entry - https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/froggatt-walter-wilson-6251;  Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation entry - https://www.eoas.info/biogs/P001050b.htm ; and  
(3) Robert Brown (1773–1858), author of Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van-Diemen and who accompanied Matthew Flinders and his journey on the Investigator. Australian Dictionary of Biography entry - 
(4) Patrick Murray, Baron de Livistine  (?-1661)  Can't really confirm any information about him, possibly he was the second Earl Elibank of Livingston in Scotland - but there are inconsistencies with his death date all over the internet and Ancestry. 
(5) Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1813). His book The Malay Archipelago was published in 1869.  https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alfred-Russel-Wallace
(6) Charles Edward Lane-Poole (1885-1970). Australian Dictionary of Biography entry -
(7) Allan Cunningham (1791-1839) - colleague of Robert Brown. 
 Australian Dictionary of Biography entry   https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/cunningham-allan-1941
(8) Ernest Giles (1835-1897). Australian Dictionary of Biography entry - https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/giles-ernest-3611
(9) Horn Exploring Expedition, organised by William Austin Horn (1841-1922), mining magnate, to find evidence of  older forms of life in the MacDonnell Ranges, Central Australia.  Australian Dictionary of Biography entry - https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/horn-william-austin-6734; Horn Expedition - Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation entry  https://www.eoas.info/biogs/P006856b.htm
(10) Professor Ralph Tate ( 1840-1901) - Australian Dictionary of Biography entry https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/tate-ralph-4688
(11) and (12) Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh (1844-1900), second son of Queen Victoria. In 1866.He married Grand Duchess Marie (1853 - 1920, called Princess Maria of Russia in the article). She was the daughter of Tsar Alexander II of Russia (1818-1881) Source: The Golden Age of Royalty: Photography from 1858-1930 by Trevor Hall (Coombe Books 1981)
(12) See footnote 11

Friday, March 27, 2026

Fourteen days in gaol for stealing Palm branches

In February 1897, James Cash was charged with stealing part of a growing tree - palm branches valued at five shillings. He was sentenced to fourteen days on gaol, which seems a very severe punishment. 

James Cash stealing part of a growing tree

Stealing Palm Branches -
James Cash pleaded guilty at the City Court on Friday to "stealing part of a growing tree," value 5s., the property of the Board of Land and Works. A constable gave evidence that on the day previous he saw accused coming out of the Wellington Gardens with some palm branches in his hands. He said he had got them in Flinders-street, where they had fallen from a tramcar. Witness went back with him to the gardens, and there found that some branches had recently been broken from a palm tree. Accused, who pleaded that he had been drinking, was sent to gaol for 14 days.
(1) 

The Wellington Gardens, are now, I believe Weedon Reserve, an allotment of land bi-sected by the tram lines, between Wellington Parade and Wellington Parade South; you can see the reserves on the map below. The Gardens were re-named Weedon Reserve in August 1913, after Sir Henry Weedon who was Lord Mayor from 1905 to 1908. (2)


Wellington Gardens, between Welling Parade and Wellington Parade South.
Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works detail plan. no. 879, City of Melbourne, 1897.
See entire plan here - State Library of Victoria https://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/121251

I came across a few other references to the crime stealing part of a growing tree, including this one -
Tree Damaged - At the South Melbourne Court this morning, Samuel Lewis was charged with breaking, with the intention of stealing part of a growing tree at Albert Park on the 3rd inst. Defendant pleaded guilty. Constable Mumford said that he saw Lewis, in company with two boys and two girls, breaking branches off a tree in the park. They said they wanted them to decorate a room for an evening party. Defendant gave his right name and address, but the others did not, and he could not find out who they were. Thomas Boyce, curator in charge of the park, said he estimated the damage done at abouL1. Defendant said be thought he was doing no harm when he broke the branches off. Mr Smith, J.P., said it was unfortunate for accused that his companions had not been arrested, as the whole thing now fell on his shoulders. Defendant was fined 5s, with 20s damages. (3)

Footnotes
(1) The Age, February 8, 1897, see here
(3) The Herald, November 24, 1904, see here. Two other references to stealing part of a growing tree can be found here - Mercury and Weekly Courier, March 27, 1890, see here and Mount Alexander Mail, January 6, 1894, see here

Thursday, March 26, 2026

The Palm Trees in Langridge Street, Middle Park

Langridge Street in Middle Park, which runs from Canterbury Road to Beaconsfield Parade, was once lined with Palm Trees. They were removed in the 1950s. What follows are any reports which I could find of these Langridge Street Palm Trees and the discussions around their eventual removal. I haven't been able to find a photograph of either Langridge Street or the Palm Trees.

From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in June 1943 
In the Public Works report the Curator reported on tree maintenance including the fact that the palms in Albert Road and Langridge Street have been cut and tidied. 
(Emerald Hill Record, June 5, 1943, see here

From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in June 1947 
The Curator reported that five Phoenix Palms in Langridge street, near the corner of Canterbury road, and one between Richardson and Page streets, on the south side, had grown to such a size that they were interfering with the overhead high tension wires; the Metropolitan Electricity Supply Department had been authorised to cut off the tops of the palms (which would eventually kill them) as a safety measure. The Committee upheld his recommendation that the six palms be removed and the nature strips prepared for future tree planting.
(Emerald Hill Record, June 14, 1947, see here

From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in September 1947 
The Curator reported: "During the last two months plane trees were pruned and palm trees in Albert road, St. Vincent place and Langridge street cut and cleared. Six palms were removed from Langridge street.
(Emerald Hill Record, September 20, 1947, see here

From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in November 1951
 
More Old Trees for the Axe. Albert Road Palms To Go.
Recommendations by the Curator for the removal of more old trees in different parts of the municipality were agreed to by the South Melbourne Council on Wednesday night, on the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. The Curator reported that 41 palm trees in Langridge st. had grown too large and lost all their beauty, and recommended that they be removed, and that during next winter pyramid trees, similar to those growing in Danks st., be planted on the nature strip of this street.

He reported also that the palm trees on the southern reserve of Albert road, between Clarendon st. and the railway, had grown to such an extent that they had to be frequently cut back to avoid interference with telephone cables and overhead wires on the tramway track, and recommended that approval be given for the removal of the palm trees on both sides of Albert road in this section, the work to be carried out after the Royal visit next year. The young Queensland box trees already planted on these reserves would then have a chance to become properly established.

The Chairman of the Public Works Committee, Cr. Phillips, expressed himself as not altogether in agreement with a recommendation of the Committee. He said he did not agree with the substitution of pyramid trees for the palms, though he agreed that the palms should be removed. "The trouble is," Cr. Phillips said, "that we lack variety in the street trees used. Why not mix trees? This is especially desirable in view of the slow growth of pyramid trees. We should be more experimental and imaginative."

Cr. Duncan said he wondered if it would not be possible to accept part of the report and delete portion, thus enabling the curator to be consulted regarding trees in the particular area. There was no doubt that the palm trees should be removed. Cr. Phillips agreed to the deletion of that part of the clause referring to the planting of pyramid trees, to enable discussion with the curator as to the best type of tree to plant in place of the palms.
(Emerald Hill Record, November 10, 1951, see here


From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in July 1952
Residents opposed to the removal of Street Palm Trees
South Melbourne Council on Wednesday night received a letter from residents of Langridge Street, Middle Park, and of Beaconsfield Parade, objecting to removal of the palm trees in Langridge Street. Of the signatories, 48 were opposed to the removal, and only one in favour. Cr. Duncan said that the decision to remove the trees had been reached some time ago. In his opinion the trees did not measure up to the standard which should be required of street trees - to provide either beauty and shade, or beauty, or shade. The palms did none of these. It would be better to remove the trees and replace them with suitable street trees. He moved that the matter be referred back to committee.

Cr. Trevorrow agreed with Cr. Duncan, and seconded the motion. In future, substitute trees should be planted before unsuitable trees were removed. Cr. Strickland spoke on behalf of the petitioners. He said that he had inspected the palms, and while those from Patterson Street to the Parade were in bad shape, those north of Patterson Street were in relatively good condition. The people in Langridge Street were proud of their palms, and were deeply concerned at the removal. They had a decided antipathy to small ornamental trees as substitutes, as these provide no shade. He suggested that the removal be delayed until the matter had been further investigated.

Cr. Hicks, in support of the palms, expressed his doubt as to whether other trees would thrive in the sandy area and windy atmosphere of Langridge Street. The matter was referred back to the works committee for further investigation.
(Emerald Hill Record, August 1, 1952, see here

From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in August 1952  
Council discusses Fate of Trees
The song of the trees echoed again through South Melbourne Council chamber on Wednesday night, when the clauses in the report of the public works committee with the removal of palms in Langridge Street and Albert Road, and elms in City Road - came under discussion. 

Cr. Cooper, referring to the fact that the Albert Road palms had "outlived their usefulness" asked the meaning of the phrase. Cr. Trevorrow suggested that the trees concerned were of the gentler sex. Had they been males they would have been curtly described as "just old."

Cr. Strickland said that he had a petition, signed by all except three residents of Langridge Street, pleading for the lives of the palms there. In the meantime, signatories had asked him to express to the public works committee thanks for the year's reprieve granted to the remaining palms north of Patterson Street; find to ask that it be made permanent.
(Emerald Hill Record, August 15, 1952, see here


From a report of a South Melbourne Council Meeting in June 1954
Langridge St. Palms. Middle Park A.L.P. Seeks Removal
At its meeting on Wednesday night the South Melbourne Council received a letter from the Middle Park branch of the Australian Labor Party. The letter thanked the Council for improving the lighting at the Albert Road - Kerferd Road railway viaduct; and asked the Council to replace the palm trees in Langridge Street, Middle Park, with more suitable trees. Cr. Layfield, moving that the letter be referred to the Works Committee, said that it was agreeable to receive a letter appreciative of an action by the Council.

As to the request regarding the Langridge Street palm trees, it would be recalled that some time ago the Council had reversed a decision to remove the trees when residents petitioned against their removal. Now, apparently, the objectors had changed their minds. He moved that the letter be referred to the Works Committee in order than an authoritative report could be received from the Curator.

Cr. Dwyer, seconding the motion, said that he thought the Council already had a report from the Curator on the Langridge Street palms. A start had been made some two years ago on the removal of the Langridge Street palms. They had been removed between Beaconsfield Parade and Paterson Street. But as the result of a petition by residents it was decided to let the rest of the palms remain.

Cr. Dwyer said that he thought that the petitioners at that time had been somehow or other misled into thinking that the Council had no intention of replanting the street with trees. He thought that the petitioners signed under that misapprehension. The palms were a danger in the street. They darkened the footpaths, and made the street unpleasant for pedestrians on dark winter nights. From his own point of view he thought them a menace. But it would be a good thing to take a Gallup poll of the people in the street. The motion was carried.
(Emerald Hill Record, June 12, 1954, see here)